No.
|
Content
|
|
|
Executive summary
|
|
|
Methodology
|
|
1
|
Factors influencing China’s glyphosate industry
|
|
1.1
|
Economic environment
|
|
1.2
|
Government policy
|
|
1.3
|
Global demand
|
|
1.3.1
|
Overview of global genetically modified crop
|
|
1.4
|
Competition with overseas glyphosate industry
|
|
1.5
|
Entry barriers of glyphosate industry
|
|
2
|
Glyphosate upstream industry
|
|
2.1
|
Key raw materials & intermediates of glyphosate
|
|
2.2
|
Glycine
|
|
2.3
|
IDAN
|
|
2.4
|
DEA
|
|
2.5
|
Paraformaldehyde
|
|
2.6
|
PMIDA
|
|
2.7
|
Impacts of raw materials on glyphosate industry
|
|
3
|
Glyphosate supply
|
|
3.1
|
Glyphosate registration situation
|
|
3.2
|
Glyphosate technical
|
|
3.2.1
|
China's position in global glyphosate technical supply
|
|
3.2.2
|
Total supply
|
|
3.2.3
|
Supplier
|
|
3.2.4
|
Production by region
|
|
3.2.5
|
Production by production route
|
|
3.3
|
Glyphosate formulations
|
|
3.3.1
|
Overview
|
|
3.3.2
|
Introduction to specific formulations
|
|
3.3.3
|
China’s weakness in formulation production
|
|
3.3.4
|
China’s glyphosate formulation trend and its impacts on global market
|
|
3.4
|
Forecast on glyphosate supply in the next five years
|
|
4
|
Circulation
|
|
4.1
|
Trade analysis
|
|
4.1.1
|
Trade position in the world
|
|
4.1.2
|
Antidumping issues involving Chinese glyphosate
|
|
4.1.3
|
Export situation of PMIDA and glyphosate
|
|
4.1.4
|
Chinese glyphosate flow
|
|
4.2
|
Price
|
|
4.2.1
|
Price changes in the past and key factors
|
|
4.2.2
|
Price forecast, 2020–2022
|
|
5
|
Demand for glyphosate
|
|
5.1
|
Overview of China's glyphosate consumption
|
|
5.2
|
Position and market size of glyphosate in herbicide industry
|
|
5.3
|
Glyphosate application in China
|
|
5.3.1
|
By specific formulation
|
|
5.3.2
|
By crop
|
|
5.4
|
Forecast on glyphosate demand in the next five years
|
|
6
|
Production technology & technology level
|
|
6.1
|
AEA pathway
|
|
6.1.1
|
Description
|
|
6.1.2
|
Development of AEA pathway in China
|
|
6.1.3
|
Theoretical consumption of raw materials for AEA pathway
|
|
6.1.4
|
Advantages and problems
|
|
6.2
|
DEA route
|
|
6.2.1
|
Description
|
|
6.2.2
|
Development of DEA route in China
|
|
6.2.3
|
Theoretical consumption of raw materials for DEA route
|
|
6.2.4
|
Advantages and problems
|
|
6.3
|
IDAN route
|
|
6.3.1
|
Description
|
|
6.3.2
|
Development of IDAN route in China
|
|
6.3.3
|
Theoretical consumption of raw materials for IDAN route
|
|
6.3.4
|
Advantages and problems
|
|
6.4
|
Comparison of different pathways and development trend
|
|
6.5
|
Wastewater treatment technology
|
|
7
|
Competitive landscape of Chinese glyphosate industry
|
|
8
|
Challenges, commercial opportunities and recommendation
|
|
9
|
Profiles of key glyphosate technical producers
|
|
9.1
|
Hubei Trisun Chemicals Co., Ltd.
|
|
9.2
|
Fuhua Tongda Agro-chemical Technology Co., Ltd.
|
|
9.3
|
Zhejiang Wynca Chemical Industry Group Co., Ltd.
|
|
9.4
|
Nantong Jiangshan Agrochemical & Chemicals Co., Ltd.
|
|
9.5
|
Jiangsu Good Harvest-Weien Agrochemical Co., Ltd.
|
|
9.6
|
Jiangsu Yangnong Chemical Co., Ltd.
|
|
9.7
|
Leshan Hebang Agricultural Technology Co., Ltd.
|
|